Site Feed Add to Google


New Pricing Book: Late 2009

White Customers Pay More Than Asians for Fish

Kathyrn Graddy and George Hall of Brandeis University have an interesting National Bureau of Economic Research paper titled “A Dynamic Model of Price Discrimination and Inventory Management at the Fulton Fish Market.”

For 111 business days in 1991 - 1992, Kathryn collected price data on sales of whiting fish sold by a fish dealer at the Fulton Fish Market in New York City. At the time, only six dealers sold whiting fish in a market that the authors characterize as “conducive to tacit collusion.” Many dealers had been there for years, trade supply with each other, and receive feedback from customers about other dealers’ prices. The authors also note that the presence of organized crime may have also discouraged entry.

The buying process of whiting is straightforward. A customer approaches a dealer and asks for a price quote. The dealer offers a price and the customer usually either accepts or passes. It is interesting that there is no additional negotiation. If a buyer finds the price too high, they move on to another dealer for a price quote. Thus, a dealer must immediately size up a customer’s willingness to pay. The price per pound of whiting during this 111 day period ranged from 33 cents per pound to $1.75 per pound.

The authors found that lower prices were systematically offered to Asians compared to White customers. The average difference between the races amounted to 6.3 cents per pound. Prices were quoted discretely and the authors feel it unlikely that White and Asian buyers knew that each group was being charged different prices.

What’s interesting is that this price difference has less to do with negotiating skills (since there was little negotiation). Instead, it is a result of the different valuations that buyers place on whiting. The authors note that Asians tended to resell the whole fish in retail shops, fry the fish for sandwiches, or make them into fish balls. Most of these establishments were located in very poor neighborhoods. Thus, there was little room to raise prices to end-users. Conversely, White buyers had more scope to pass on higher prices to customers. For a local fish dealer in Princeton, New Jersey, whiting was a small part of his purchases and his customers would often pay higher prices if he explained that wholesale prices were expensive. Thus, he spent no time shopping around for price.

While the 6.3 cent per pound price differential is of interest, the bigger lesson for B2B firms is that the resale opportunities for their products differ by each wholesale customer. Some wholesale customers have more latitude (and willingness) to pass along higher prices than others. For whiting at the Fulton Fish Market, Asians couldn’t pass along price increases while Whites could. Why shouldn’t B2B companies capitalize on these different pricing opportunities by charging different wholesale prices?

Apologies for the missed blog last week – I am in the homestretch of completing my new pricing book. Have a Happy Fourth of July!

June 29th, 2009 | Comments (2) | Permalink | Send To Friend

Dynamic Pricing is the Right Concert Ticket Pricing Strategy for Today

Please check out my guest editorial published by The Wrap, a Hollywood Internet site that focuses on entertainment industry analysis and breaking Hollywood news.

June 18th, 2009 | Comments (0) | Permalink | Send To Friend

Discovery Channel’s “Deadliest Catch” and Pricing

I must confess to my guilty pleasure of regularly watching the Discovery Channel’s “Deadliest Catch” television show. Reportedly shown in over 150 countries, this reality show details the lives of skippers and crew who work in the deadliest profession – crab fishing in Alaska. Every show’s plot is predictable: fishing is bad (frustration), a few side plots (rivalries, human stories, and so on), and then at the end of the show, massive amounts of crab are caught (cue to crew dancing with joy). There’s something oddly entrancing to watch traps overflowing with king crab (hence profits) being pulled on board.

Interested in learning more, I researched the Deadliest Catch and Alaskan crab fishing…from a pricing perspective, of course.

It’s all about value. I was surprised to learn that close to 70% of all king crab consumed in the U.S. is imported, mostly from Russia. I always assumed that king crab came from Alaska. But come to think of it, most restaurants just advertise “king crab,” not its country of origin. Some of this Russian king crab is caught in the same sea that the Alaskan crabbers fish in. The Russian fleet is reportedly over fishing (which is not ecologically sustainable) and flooding the market with extra supply. This has resulted in significant price decreases for king crab. This understandably upsets Alaskan crabbers. From a value perspective, would you pay a premium at a store or restaurant for king crab legs that are advertised as “caught and processed in Alaska” compared to those from Russia? I would.

Is this really value? Captain Sig, one of the show’s main characters, has licensed his likeness (and that of his boat) to a company that is selling crab legs caught in Russia. These “Sig branded” two pound packages are sold at Wal-Mart stores. It’s an interesting deal as an endorser usually has some involvement in the product that they endorse. Consider the line of Wolfgang Puck products. Mr. Puck presumably has some input to the recipes of the food products attached to his name. However, in this case Captain Sig appears to be simply lending his name to a Russian company. Do consumers really value (thus, willing to pay more for) such an endorsement?

Negotiating en mass reaps profits. I found it interesting that approximately 70% of the crab fleet that fishes in the Bering Sea is represented by the Inter-Cooperative Exchange. This cooperative negotiates prices on behalf of its members with the six processors that purchase crab from the boats. By controlling so much of the supply, the cooperative holds market power which enables it to negotiate better prices. After all, if processors can’t come to an agreement with the cooperative, they lose out on 70% of the supply. Negotiating en masse results in higher profits compared to if each boat negotiates individually or accepts markets prices.

The Deadliest Catch is on the Discovery Channel on Tuesdays at 9 PM.

June 10th, 2009 | Comments (0) | Permalink | Send To Friend

[Return to Top]
Copyright © 2007-2009 Culture of Profit, LLC. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Contact Us